Category: Writing as a Team

Two people writing as a team can have advantages over soloist authors. But to have a fruitful writing partnership we must adopt a process that utilizes our strengths, and we need a relationship that’s strong enough to support the endeavor. Here’s where we explore the matter from various angles.

Checking Your Wing Mirrors

r-avatar

We all have strengths and weaknesses. Authors, wrangling entire fictional universes and speaking on behalf of the disparate denizens thereof, must be able to pretend to strengths (and sometimes, weaknesses) that they don’t really possess. We must speak with authority even when we don’t know what we’re talking about. And we must assemble a world that coheres, hiding its seams lest readers trip over them.

On the subject of blind spots, Charlie Jane Anders did a great think piece recently arguing that your personal blind spots hold a powerful key to better writing. Focus on identifying the gaps in your view, because that’s where treasures are hiding.

Writing as a team is a good system for minimizing blind spots. There being two of you doubles the chances of someone noticing an issue, but the benefit is even greater than a simple linear effect. Working together forces you to articulate ideas before they’ve become entrenched in prose. In the auxiliary writing cave, we speak often of “magical thinking,” and work to root it out. As new plot possibilities come up while we’re developing a story, we challenge them, prove them out. As the “official” plot grows, we talk it through in turns. That puts one of us on the spot to be able to string all the ideas together, meaning if the logic is flimsy in spots that’s where the stumbles will happen. Meanwhile, the other person listens and chimes in with corrections and questions where needed. It’s a very robust setup.

Talking things through is a great way to verify what you know and uncover unspoken assumptions, and it works even better when there’s someone to listen.

Looking Ahead at 2016

r-avatarIt’s a brand new year, which means it’s time to draw up a plan for our writing.

Son of Music Novel’s first draft is resting quietly in the virtual bottom drawer. Once we’ve forgotten everything we wrote we’ll pick it up again and edit it with fresh eyes, then take it to our critique group.

To help us do that forgetting we’ve begun to spec out Son of Science Novel. We had approximately a day and a half of just sort of staring at each other, trying to remember who had survived the first book in the series and imagine what they might get up to next. Then – BOOM! – the ideas exploded and we’ve started filling up the pages in a new steno pad. Jen’s made her first timeline and her first list of potential character names. Kent’s list of topics to research is growing by the minute. It’s amazingly fun.

Not that it will be fun for our characters. Nope. They’ll hate us, which is how it should be.

Coming into the brainstorming we had some pictures and preliminary notes on two real-world locations that seemed like fruitful story settings. Early ideas seemed to rule them both out, though, much to our chagrin. But now we’ve found a way to work with one, and possibly both of them. Huzzah!

We’d like to think that the brainstorming and outlining won’t take as long as they did for Son of Music Novel. If they keep going at this pace, we should be golden.

Once we get this baby outlined nicely, we’ll switch back to Son of Music Novel and do those edits, and while we’re at it we’ll pull up Music Novel itself and find ways to tie the two narratives together more strongly.

Meanwhile, we’re waiting for good news from the agent who is currently looking at Science Novel. 2016 might just be the year this all takes off.

2015 – That Was The Year That Was

r-avatarIn January of 2015 we wrote up a schedule for our year in writing, and then promptly did not look at it again until just now. Imagine our shock and delight when we discovered that we pretty much stuck to the plan!

  • Novel #5 (aka The Science Novel) is in the hands of an extremely capable agent, and we’re reminding ourselves to be patient as we await a reply
  • Novel #6 (aka Son of Music Novel) is in the can
  • and we have indeed begun brainstorming for Novel #7 (aka Son of Science Novel)

But how did we get here? Let us cuddle up with warm beverages and take a look back at 2015.

January was all about getting to know our new characters.

February saw us chugging through the outlining of Novel #6, and extolling the virtues of writing partnerships.

By March we had most of the kinks worked out of the rough outline we call the Plot Rainbow, and were preparing to move to the next step in our process.

In April we were still in the preparatory phase for the new novel, honing the characters’ voices, and dealing with a (gasp!) disagreement in the Writing Cave.

May brought the actual start of composition. Finally.

In June we were patting ourselves on the back for our deft theme incorporation and thorough world-building.

We spent much of July talking about music. This is Son of Music Novel, so it makes sense. Also, we were 43,000 words in!

By the first week of August that word count had leapt to 72,000 words. Yikes! We talked about our marketing efforts, and also went on a field trip.

Our schedule disruptions continued in September when we attended a writing conference and visited with our good friend and fellow author Reggie Lutz.

In October we were still chugging away on the first draft, encountering only a few minor problems.

November saw completion of the main narrative. We even had time to read through the whole damn thing over Thanksgiving break.

Which brings us up to the present day, December 2015. Son of Music Novel’s first draft is completely complete, ancillary material and all. Sure it’s long, but we’ll worry about that later. For now we’re making plans to see Star Wars again before Kent heads back to work.

Next week we’ll talk about our plans for the upcoming year.

Happy New Year!

Celebrating as a Team

r-avatarIt’s important to celebrate your writing progress with your coauthor, and today we’re doing just that. Instead of putting the final touches on Son of Music Novel, or writing an actual blog post about collaboration, we’ve opted to take the whole family to a galaxy far, far away.

2979968-star-wars-bb-8-force-awakens

We’ll be back next week with actual content. Happy Star Wars one and all!

 

 

 

When the Time is Right

r-avatarThe first draft of Son of Music Novel is 99% done. (Amazing how the last couple of percentage points take so much  longer to complete!) Soon we’ll be ready to start taking it to critique group, which is very exciting. We’re really looking forward to getting input from a bunch of very smart fellow writers.

This time out we’re following the same policy we had great success with on the Science Novel: waiting until the draft is entirely written and the known issues are dealt with before taking it in. That allows us to keep input in perspective because we can weigh comments against what we know about how the various arcs ultimately play out. Sometimes it’s a good thing if readers get pissed off! The fun is in watching them take the ride.

Certainly, there are other ways to manage critique. Past experience has taught us to prefer this method. The Music Novel itself is a case in point. With that one, we started taking it to group when we hit approximately the halfway mark. That was intended to give us time to reach the end before our critiquers caught up, and in that regard it worked fine. Thing is, we then did a major restructuring that rendered much of the original input moot. Fortunately, by the time the second version was ready we had new critique group members available, meaning there were unspoiled readers by whom we could gauge the success of our changes. It’s very hard to look at successive drafts as if for the first time.

In the primordial phase of our fictive endeavors, when crude stick-figure drawings of mammoth hunters first appeared on the walls of the writing cave, we used to take stuff in whenever we had stuff. Often this meant a new chapter would go through group before we’d even written the next one. The drive to produce something so you can take it in is a plus, but we ran into some serious downsides. Premature input can be very distracting. Even with an outline telling you, broadly, where things end up, it’s easy to fall into trying to “fix” your critiquers’ attitudes about particular characters or events. You might even be talked into departing from your carefully planned outline.

Talking to your critique group about a work in progress can lead to inspiration. Critique’s a collaborative process, after all. Knowing that other people are taking your story to heart, investing energy in understanding it, is very motivating. Depending on your process, you might thrive on the in-the-moment feedback, or even depend on the influx of ideas that arise in discussion.

Are you in a critique group? (You should be.) How do you get the most out of it? What works best with your style?

Happy Gobble-Gobble Day

r-avatarWe completed a read-through on Wednesday, including the discussion and collation of our copious notes from the various copies we had going. The book feels good. Actually, it feels great! (Our bias is duly acknowledged.)

To everyone, we hope you enjoy safe travels and harmonious companionship this holiday.

Time to Pop Some Champagne!

r-avatarSo hey! Guess what! The first draft is complete!

Kent wrapped up the last of the scenes that needed to be written, not to be confused with the last scene in the story, which Jen had already done by then. The book’s a beast and a half, and it’s done. We feel really good about it, very proud of what we’ve accomplished. Rune Skelley isn’t anybody’s idea of a fast writer, but the books are taking us less time to create as we get more practice and our process becomes second nature.

Okay, okay. It’s not done done. As with its predecessor, this book has a meta-narrative running throughout, and that’s not all done. And it doesn’t make sense to push onward with that part until we’ve done a read-through, so that’s the next step. Normally we like to let manuscripts rest before the first read-through, but in this case we don’t want to spin up any new projects yet. So, right back in.

Which means maybe that cork should stay in the bottle just a little longer. No point doing the reading if we won’t remember it tomorrow.

Two Brains Are Better Than One

r-avatarSo we’re motoring right along, finishing scenes at a healthy clip, when Jen suddenly pulls the handle on the emergency brake and we come clattering to a halt. The problem? Oh, only a fairly significant plot hole. Nothing major.

It wasn’t as bad as “plot hole” might make it sound. We knew where the characters were, and we knew where they were going to end up, and here in the writing cave we knew that it would work just fine. But on the page we left a couple of steps out of the journey and someone was bound to notice. Luckily for us (this time) it was Jen that did the noticing, which gave us the opportunity to backtrack a little bit and throw in some road signs to help the reader understand how the characters end up in the right place.

Having a writing partner is a distinct advantage. Our problem would have been harder to fix if it hadn’t been discovered until the draft was finished and in the hands of test readers. Or even worse, what if it managed to sneak through the whole editorial process only to snag paying customers?

As authors it’s our job to make the story world feel as real as possible, and it’s a job that’s a lot easier to do when you have access to two brains.

Manuscript Out of Order

r-avatarThere’s no rule that scenes must be written chronologically. There are cases, though, where that’s what works best. Scenes that link tightly, places with fast pacing, or sections of the outline that leave things a little too vague (yup, that even happens here in the writing cave sometimes).

Our current chronology constraint has to do with the emotional tenor of the material. To know how the characters should treat each other in Scene D, we must first write Scene C, which is dependent on Scene B, and ultimately Scene A. None of which is an issue for a solo author; the scenes all have to get written at some point. But when two people are coordinating their efforts, it becomes a problem.

This longish series of interdependent scenes impacted our workflow by interfering with our usual habit of divvying up the work so Kent and Jen both have scenes to write. Those four scenes became a one-lane bridge, because the work in the queue had to be assigned to one person.

By happenstance, the scenes in question were assigned to Kent. (Actually, they were assigned that way by Jen, but there was nothing malicious about it.) This somewhat aggravated our workflow dilemma because he is the less-speedy member of the writing team. It started to seem like Jen might be stranded on her side of the river for quite some time.

Fortunately, Jen is resourceful. While Kent wrote all those scenes, she flitted throughout the first draft to take care of things we had in our notes. Punching up theme, keeping the continuity in line, honing the characters’ voices. Now we have that much less to worry about when it’s time for a second draft. And Kent has passed the baton; now it’s Jen’s turn to write the next scene, if she can remember how.

 

Q&A with Kayne Milhomme

r-avatarThis week we’re honored to share interview with our friend Kayne Milhomme. Kayne has experience with literary agents, and editors, and in self-publishing. His historical mystery, Grace and Disgrace, came about via a collaborative process. We asked him to talk about that with us.

 

qCongrats on your debut, Grace and Disgrace. Plug your book, dude!

a

Thanks! First off, it is my debut novel (as noted above). I hope it is as fun to read as it was to write. So far it’s getting great reviews from readers on Amazon and Goodreads, which is very encouraging.

Below is a brief blurb. Interested in more? Check it out!

In their college days, three friends created the Sleuthhound Club to solve local mysteries and crimes, but only one of the friends turned that early hobby into a career. Inspector Touhay of the Royal Irish Constabulary has seen a lot of action in his line of business, including the infamous crime that ruined his reputation—the amazing theft of the Templar Diamond.

Now six years after the theft, new evidence comes to light as key players (including Touhay) receive mysterious invitations to “The Chase” for the missing Diamond. And who better to help Tuohay find the missing artifact than the members of his old club?

Danger, betrayal, puzzles and ploys abound in this turn-of-the-century mystery novel, which will keep you guessing up until the very end.

 

qYou and your father have an interesting writing partnership. Can you describe how it works?

a

First, I’d like to give a little background about my dad. He has always had a passion for history, and his passion is infectious. When he discovers something that interests him, he’ll dig—and dig, and dig—until he has uncovered nearly every stone connected to his discovery. Then he shares it—on his history blog, in the local newspaper, Facebook updates (with links to his blog and/or newspaper articles), or on long walks in the woods—you name it. His research typically involves uncovering the stories of remarkable individuals that the annals of history have somehow missed, to bring their stories to life—and through that effort, bring the time period and their settings to life as well, truly recreating the moment in history.

Thus, when it comes to a partnership, my dad foremost brings motivation and a source of positive energy that casts a warm ray of sunlight on my writing endeavors. In the earliest stages of a project, his excitement at the future prospect is fuel for the work ahead. Together we will brainstorm ideas, and then our paths will diverge—my dad will begin researching historical elements of the ideas (ranging from to the very specific to the very broad), as I begin some writing samples. Typically, new ideas sprout from both the research and some of the writing samples, and after several iterations we are ready for launch (i.e. to begin chapter writing). As the chapter writing unfolds, my dad acts as reviewer, reading each chapter after completion, and providing feedback. Concurrently, he is providing additional research on items for future chapters, as they are identified. As we move further into the novel, I typically get a firmer grasp on the plot (and by this point the character voices are usually defined), and my dad’s role switches gears to true readership—and he becomes the first reader to try to figure out the mystery that he had a hand in creating the first elements of, but I have finalized in my later stage plot development.

So the partnership is very fluid, with partnered brainstorming and plot development in the early stages, research performed by my dad throughout the novel, writing performed by me and reviewing from a reader’s perspective with some line editing as well from my dad, and then a full assessment after the first draft is completed. It’s a wonderful partnership!

 

qHow did your writing partnership begin?

a

Several years ago I was working on a few ‘high fantasy’ novels, and as fun as they were to write, I couldn’t quite get them to connect for me into something meaningful. I enjoyed the writing, but didn’t know what I was trying to write about—other than entertainment, what was the theme? The purpose? And this void, so to speak, had nothing to do with the fantasy genre, it was simply driven by my inability to find meaning in my own work. During this timeframe, my dad and I went for one of our biannual walks in the woods by the lake at my parents’ house. During that walk, my dad talked about a research project he had been working on—a turn-of-the-century priest who had supposedly committed suicide under mysterious circumstances, and, based on my dad’s research, had been a real rabble rouser in the Catholic Church, to the point of excommunication and taking the archbishop to court (an unheard of event in turn-of-the-century Boston). The long and short it was that I became infatuated with the story, and asked my dad if we could create a fictional account of the events as a historical mystery novel. He enthusiastically agreed and off we went.

 

qWhat are some of the challenges you’ve run into collaborating in a creative endeavor?

a

The main challenge that I run into in this creative collaboration is holding up my end of the bargain in a consistent manner. As a writer, there are times when I hit the doldrums—less so when a novel is underway, but certainly during the early stages. I liken it to having a training partner for a marathon—in order for you both to succeed, you both have to work at it on a consistent basis, with little to no room for ‘slacking’. The good news is that the exact challenge that makes this collaboration work—due to the fact that I feel a need to ensure I am holding up my end of the bargain, I will find myself writing in a more focused and consistent manner than I would alone. Also, and perhaps it is the nature of our relationship, I have absolutely no issues with sharing creative ideas and brainstorming with my dad. Others have given me feedback (typically these are individuals that do not partner on these types of endeavors on a consistent basis) that they have trouble collaborating on creative endeavors, because creativity is something that is precious to them as individuals, and they have a hard time choosing one individual’s idea over another’s. I think that obstacle somewhat outrageous, in fact, and while creative collaborations are not for everyone or for every art form, it can be an enormously beneficial enterprise that is likely underutilized.

 

 

qAre you a planner or a pantser? What about what you look for in a partner: is it ‘birds of a feather’ or ‘opposites attract’?

a

If it’s possible to put myself somewhere in the middle, I would. I do not plot out a novel in significant detail prior to beginning. That said, I do identify the critical plot points, especially those that are important to the mystery. I also will capture the nature and motive of the crime, the red herrings, the hard evidence, and an idea of how all of that gets revealed—but in very general terms. What truly drives the story for me is character, and once the character(s) have “come to life,” I let them take me on the ride as I sit in the back and occasionally give directions.

In a partner, it is again somewhere in the middle. I imagine each partnership is likely different in terms of the strengths that the individuals draw upon, and in some cases it is ‘birds of a feather,’ and in others ‘opposites attract.’ In our partnership, is more along the lines of complementary skill sets (a writer, a researcher—both idea generators), a unified vision (write an entertaining, meaningful novel), and always having fun while doing it. The third one is key, because writing is a passion of mine, and research is a passion for my dad—if we are not having fun at our passions, something’s gone wrong.

 

qAnything else you’d like to teach us about collaborative writing?

a

Be open minded about it. Like I stated in an answer to one of the above questions, I believe many ‘creative types’, especially writers, journey through their creative life solo. For some, that’s the way it has to be, and the way they are at their best. But for others, collaboration could open doors that they never imagined. That said, it has to be a true partnership to work. If you don’t have patience (and I know some creative types that do not), and if you are entirely unreliable (also know some creative types like this), you may need to work on those foundational principles before delving into a partnership—because there is a level of expectation that comes with a good partnership, and you only do it justice if you are willing to perform at that level of requirement.